Page 1 sur 1

Garber: viendra, viendra pas?

Publié : 16 mai 2008 16:55
par Daniel
On a lu et entendu que Don Garber, commissaire de la MLS, a été invité au SS pour le match d'ouverture, mais à date personne n'a semblé dire qu'il y sera. Quelqu'un en sait quelque chose?

Re: Garber: viendra, viendra pas?

Publié : 16 mai 2008 19:06
par Daniel
Avec Vancouver qui parle de MLS (et le communiqué de la MLS à ce sujet), et le match Whitecaps-Montréal, on pourrait s'attendre à ce que les dirigeants des Whitecaps, de l'Impact et Garber se rencontrent au cours du week-end.

Re: Garber: viendra, viendra pas?

Publié : 16 mai 2008 19:23
par impactfanfirenze
He better F^ing viendra...what's the deal, Montreal makes an announcement with a new stadium that they wish to have an MLS club and one month later there is no response; Vancouver threatens to renovate a dinosaur and on the same day Garber issues a statement published with image on MLSnet.com?

Re: Garber: viendra, viendra pas?

Publié : 17 mai 2008 16:28
par penz
Viendra.

http://www.socceramerica.com/index.cfm? ... _aid=26570

Goin' North
by Ridge Mahoney, Friday, May 16, 2008 4:45 PM ET
WHEN THE USL MONTREAL IMPACT opens its new stadium Monday night, MLS Commissioner Don Garber and President Mark Abbott will be in attendance.

Stade Saputo (capacity 13,000) is the centerpiece of the Saputo Soccer Complex in the city's Olympic Park, not far from the Olympic Stadium that proved to be a financial sinkhole since it was built for the 1976 Olympic Games. Cost overruns, a malfunctioning retractable roof and the departure of the baseball Expos after the 2004 season redefined the term "white elephant."

The city's new soccer stadium, though, gleams among the fields and trees that surround it. It features a natural grass playing surface and according to team president Tony Saputo can easily be expanded to a capacity of about 20,000, just in case Saputo and his partners land an MLS expansion franchise.

Leaping to the conclusion that this might indicate Montreal has lapped its rivals in the MLS expansion race would be logical, since after all, Abbott is the league point man on expansion, and Garber is, well, Garber. The Impact's opponent, Vancouver, has fallen back in the expansion race because of political impasse regarding its own stadium project and none of the other expansion rivals - Atlanta, St. Louis, Miami, Portland - have a stadium ready to go, more or less.

Not coincidentally, Vancouver has announced a move into B.C. Place, which will be renovated prior to the 2010 Winter Olympics and domed following the Games. Garber has praised the move and the stadium, a hint as to which Canadian city he might prefer.

The presence of Garber and Abbott in Montreal Monday won't be nearly as significant as a sighting, or lack thereof, of someone else.

Saputo has stated he and Montreal Canadiens mogul George Gillett could join forces to buy into MLS, though the figures he cited in late March are already dated. He said he and Gillett could split the $30 million expansion fee as well as the estimated cost ($12 million) of increasing Stade Saputo capacity.

Last week, MLS stipulated the price for an expansion franchise in the next phase - following Seattle (2009) and Philadelphia (2010) - is $40 million. By the terms of its entry into the league, Toronto FC holds rights of exclusivity to MLS teams in Canada, though those rights could be waived or sold in case a Montreal bid came up for league approval. Those rights also expire after the 2009 season, and despite Saputo's brazen claim the Impact and Stade Saputo could be ready by in time for next season there's no way that's going to happen. MLS execs are understandably wary of such proclamations.

Yet at this point, the key figure in any Montreal bid is Gillett, and little has been resolved in the acrimonious dispute between Gillett and his partner in the ownership of Liverpool, Tom Hicks. The pair have been partners in past acquisitions as well as rivals in the National Hockey League (Hicks owns the Dallas Stars). Ironically, Hicks came into the Liverpool picture at the behest of Gillett.

In March, Hicks blocked Gillett's proposed sale of a 49 percent interest to Dubai International Group (DIC) for a reported $342 million and has rebuffed DIC's attempts to buy the club outright. According to Gillett, the pair's business relationship has been "unworkable" for some time. Hicks and Gillett bought Liverpool for 218.9 million pounds (then $431 million) in March, 2007, and also pledged roughly double that sum to design and build a stadium to replace Anfield.

Of joining forces with the Saputo Group, Gillett has said only there is "a mutual interest." MLS has already forged a wildly successful NHL partnership with Maple Leafs Sports & Entertainment with Toronto FC. Yet the Toronto and Montreal markets are vastly different, and assuming the latter can be identical to the former is naive. In Toronto, Garber admits the league encountered a "perfect storm" in which financial, political, logistical and governmental elements came together.

In Toronto, three possible sites/projects were discarded before local and national agencies and MLS&E agreed on a downtown location and everything else necessary for a stadium to host the 2007 FIFA U-20 World Cup as well as TFC.

The robust welcome in Philadelphia, for example, doesn't make Cleveland or St. Louis or Detroit a slam-dunk; if anything, it sets the bar higher when league officials evaluate political acceptance, resources of potential ownership groups, stadium proposals and the depth of local fanaticism (in the good sense).

In Philly, already, nearly two years before a team takes the field, more than 4,000 deposits for season tickets have been taken. The wealth and access to same of operator-investor Jay Sugarman and his partners runs well into 10 figures. City and county politicians and agencies are on board for the Chester stadium project. Any questions?

So MLS officials will watch closely attendance figures and media coverage for USL matches, the June 20 World Cup qualifier between Canada and St. Vincent & The Grenadines, and also the CONCACAF club games against Toronto and Vancouver that will determine which Canadian entry advances to group play in the Champions' League.

In an e-mail, MLS director of communications Dan Courtemanche said of Garber and Abbott heading north, "It's a friendly trip to say hello to Mr. Saputo and also see the new stadium."
If a Mr. Gillett stops by to say 'Hi', well, that may change everything. Right now, though, Montreal is just one team in the mix.

Re: Garber: viendra, viendra pas?

Publié : 17 mai 2008 23:30
par Sabre
And no tifo...

Way to go Saputo.

Re: Garber: viendra, viendra pas?

Publié : 18 mai 2008 3:11
par Main de Dieu
C'est évident que Garber et la MLS se sent tirer par l'oreille dans cette affaire.

T.O était une surprise, l'engouement de la ligue post Angel, Beckham et Altadore et cie rends la ligue plus big avec un cachet qui gonfle, bref... l'expansion comme tel est le cas aujourd'hui - c'est leurs meilleur scénario possible.

Montréal pour eux sort dans cette affaire comme une souris d'un trou.

Ils verrons lundi, que le stade a $15m était fait sans passe-passe des contacteurs, car c'était fait dans la "famille". Alors chaque sou vaut son pèsent d'or dans cette construction. C'est loin de la bol de toilette, l'autre bord au couts de milliards.

Un chose importante est l'implication des fans. Garber est pro fanatique pour vendre le sport en Amérique. Il a même supporté les fans du TFC pour leurs pitchage de bebelles sur les "corner" face au critiques ESPN.

La seule façon de convaincre cette homme va être le spectacle lundi. Garber ce soir la va être comme le dégustateur dans Ratatouille, espérons qu'il va aimer ce qu'il verra.

Image

Re: Garber: viendra, viendra pas?

Publié : 19 mai 2008 14:08
par l'ami francki
finalement je viens de voir garber à la télé sur la pelouse du Stade saputo

Re: Garber: viendra, viendra pas?

Publié : 20 mai 2008 1:37
par kurosawa

Re: Garber: viendra, viendra pas?

Publié : 20 mai 2008 10:21
par FCIM
C'est au moins un bon signe que Gillett était là...

http://www.cyberpresse.ca/article/20080 ... 2/CPSPORTS

Re: Garber: viendra, viendra pas?

Publié : 27 février 2009 14:06
par Veva
Je pense qu'il s'est trompé de forum :?

Re: Garber: viendra, viendra pas?

Publié : 27 février 2009 14:09
par kurosawa
*ilovedilorenzo* a écrit :Je pense qu'il s'est trompé de forum :?
Le forum est supposé détecter automatiquement ce genre de message et les effacer de lui même. (C'est d'ailleurs ce qui est arrivé). Suffit d'ignorer le tout le temps que la job se fasse.

Re: Garber: viendra, viendra pas?

Publié : 27 février 2009 14:34
par Veva
kurosawa a écrit :
*ilovedilorenzo* a écrit :Je pense qu'il s'est trompé de forum :?
Le forum est supposé détecter automatiquement ce genre de message et les effacer de lui même. (C'est d'ailleurs ce qui est arrivé). Suffit d'ignorer le tout le temps que la job se fasse.
Je ne savais pas ça... C'est très efficace!!

Re: Garber: viendra, viendra pas?

Publié : 27 février 2009 14:42
par kurosawa
Plus que sur d'autre forum que j'ai vu ou on peut voir de tels messages pendant presque une journée.